18: Iron Berry curvature, anomalous Hall conductivity and optical conductivity¶
- Outline: Calculate the Berry curvature, anomalous Hall conductivity, and (magneto)optical conductivity of ferromagnetic bcc Fe with spin-orbit coupling. In preparation for this example it may be useful to read Ref. 1 and Ch. 11 of the User Guide.
1-6. Compute the MLWFs and compute the energy eigenvalues and spin expectation values.
These are the same six steps of Tutorial solution 17 and therefore the results are not going to be showed here again.
Berry curvature plots¶
The Berry curvature \(\Omega_{\alpha\beta}(\mathbf{k})\) of the occupied states is defined in Eq. (11.18) of the User Guide. Plot the Berry curvature component \(\Omega_z(\mathbf{k}) = \Omega_{xy}(\mathbf{k})\) along the magnetization direction.
The Fermi energy should be \(12.6283\) eV. With this value we obtain the energy bands and the Berry curvature component \(\Omega_z(\mathbf{k}) = \Omega_{xy}(\mathbf{k})\) along high-symmetry points shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2. Eq. (11.18) of the User Guide is reported below for completeness.
with
where the Greek letters indicate Cartesian coordinates, \(\varepsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma}\) is the Levi-Civita antisymmetric tensor, and \(\vert u_{n\mathbf{k}}\rangle\)s are the cell-periodic Bloch functions.
Combine the plot of the Fermi lines on the \(k_y\) plane with a heat-map plot of (minus) the Berry curvature.
The plot of the Fermi lines with a colour-map of \(-\Omega_z(k_x,0,k_z)\) is shown in Figure 3.
Anomalous Hall conductivity¶
AHC converges rather slowly with k-point sampling, and a \(25 \times 25 \times 25\) does not yield a well-converged value. Compare the converged AHC value with those obtained in Refs. 2 and 1.
The x,y,z-components of the AHC for a \(25\times25\times25\) BZ mesh are shown in the snippet below. The converged result reported in Refs. 2 and 1 for the z-component is 756.76 (\((\Omega \mathrm{cm})^{-1}\)). Hence, a \(25\times25\times25\) BZ mesh clearly gives a very inaccurate value (\(\sim 36.4\%\) error). Even with adaptive refinement the error is still very large (\(\sim 31.7\%\)). It is worth to note that the adaptive refinement slightly breaks the symmetry and gives non-zero values for the x-component and y-component, although these are opposite in sign.
Properties calculated in module b e r r y
------------------------------------------
* Anomalous Hall conductivity
Interpolation grid: 25 25 25
Fermi energy (ev): 12.6283
AHC (S/cm) x y z
========== -0.0000 0.0000 554.6437
Total Execution Time 59.112 (sec)
Properties calculated in module b e r r y
------------------------------------------
* Anomalous Hall conductivity
Regular interpolation grid: 25 25 25
Adaptive refinement grid: 5 5 5
Refinement threshold: Berry curvature >100.00 bohr^2
Points triggering refinement: 42( 0.27%)
Fermi energy (ev): 12.6283
AHC (S/cm) x y z
========== 2.4602 -2.4602 574.2950
Since these are quite demanding calculations, we only report the value of the AHC for a \(125\times125\times125\) BZ mesh with a \(5\times5\times5\) adaptive refinement grid (see snippet below). The value for the z-component is 729.8276 \((\Omega \mathrm{cm})^{-1}\), which is in much closer agreement with the converged result from Refs. 2 and 1. Also, the magnitude of x,y-component is greatly reduced as expected.
Properties calculated in module b e r r y
------------------------------------------
* Anomalous Hall conductivity
Regular interpolation grid: 125 125 125
Adaptive refinement grid: 5 5 5
Refinement threshold: Berry curvature >100.00 Ang^2
Points triggering refinement: 1818( 0.09%)
Fermi energy (ev): 12.6283
AHC (S/cm) x y z
========== -0.2775 0.2775 729.8276
The Wannier-interpolation formula for the Berry curvature comprises three terms, denoted \(J0\), \(J1\), and \(J2\) in Ref. 3.
From Ref. 2
where
The three components \(J0, J1\) and \(J2\) for the \(k\)-point sampling of \(125\times125\times125\) and a \(5\times5\times5\) adaptive refinement grid are shown in the snippet below
J0 term : 0.0002 -0.0002 2.8479
J1 term : 0.0004 -0.0004 18.4855
J2 term : -0.2782 0.2782 708.4942
-------------------------------------------
Optical conductivity¶
The optical conductivity tensor of bcc Fe with magnetization along \(\hat{\mathbf{z}}\) has the form:
The DC AHC calculated earlier corresponds to \(\sigma_{xy}\) in the limit \(\omega \rightarrow 0\). At finite frequency \(\sigma_{xy} = -\sigma_{yx}\) acquires an imaginary part which describes magnetic circular dichroism (MCD). Compute the complex optical conductivity for \(\hbar\omega\) up to \(7\) eV.
The plot for the ac AHC is shown in Figure 4.
Compare the \(\omega \rightarrow 0\) limit of \(\sigma_{xy}\) with the result obtained earlier by integrating the Berry curvature.
The result obtained by integrating the Berry curvature is 729.83 \((\Omega \mathrm{cm})^{-1}\) and the \(\omega \rightarrow 0\) limit of the complex optical conductivity is \(669.37\) \((\Omega \mathrm{cm})^{-1}\).
Plot the MCD spectrum.
The plot of the magnetic circular dichroism is shown in Figure 5.
Further ideas¶
Recompute the AHC and optical spectra of bcc Fe using projected s, p, and d-type Wannier functions instead of the hybridrised MLWFs (see Example 8), and compare the results.
First we have to modify the projection block in the input file Fe.win as did
in Tutorial solution 8
Then we need to re-do points 3,4 and 6.
Below there is the extract from the output file Fe.wpout. The result obtained
from \(s,p\) and \(d\) projections for the \(z\) component, i.e. \(\sigma_{xy}\), of the
AHC is exactly the same as the one obtained from \(sp_3d_2,d_{xy},d_{xz}\), and
\(d_{yz}\) projections. Plot of AHC and MCD are shown in Figure 6.
Properties calculated in module b e r r y
------------------------------------------
* Anomalous Hall conductivity
Regular interpolation grid: 25 25 25
Adaptive refinement grid: 5 5 5
Refinement threshold: Berry curvature >100.00 bohr^2
Points triggering refinement: 42( 0.27%)
Fermi energy (ev): 12.6283
AHC (S/cm) x y z
==========
J0 term : 0.0006 -0.0006 -2.9033
J1 term : 0.0032 -0.0032 10.0566
J2 term : 2.4564 -2.4564 567.1417
-------------------------------------------
Total : 2.4602 -2.4602 574.2950
![]() |
![]() |
-
Yugui Yao, Leonard Kleinman, A. H. MacDonald, Jairo Sinova, T. Jungwirth, Ding-sheng Wang, Enge Wang, and Qian Niu. First principles calculation of anomalous hall conductivity in ferromagnetic bcc fe. Phys. Rev. Lett., 92:037204, 2004. ↩↩↩↩
-
Xinjie Wang, Jonathan R. Yates, Ivo Souza, and David Vanderbilt. Ab initio calculation of the anomalous hall conductivity by wannier interpolation. Phys. Rev. B, 74:195118, 2006. ↩↩↩↩
-
M. G. Lopez, David Vanderbilt, T. Thonhauser, and Ivo Souza. Wannier-based calculation of the orbital magnetization in crystals. Phys. Rev. B, 85:014435, 2012. ↩

